The Thing About Skins, responding to the sentiment of 'Blowing up Mt. Rushmore.' Wilbert Cooper (an editor at wrote an article entitled Let’s Blow Up Mt. Rushmore, as a response to the notion of tearing down racist monuments. Paramount Pictures

Paramount Pictures

The Thing About Skins, responding to the sentiment of 'Blowing up Mt. Rushmore.' Wilbert Cooper (an editor at wrote an article entitled Let’s Blow Up Mt. Rushmore, as a response to the notion of tearing down racist monuments.

Native People Discuss What To Do About Mt. Rushmore (No, Don’t Blow it Up, Stupid Ass

The Thing About Skins: A response to VICE editor Wilbert Cooper regarding his article, 'Let’s Blow Up Mt. Rushmore'

Charlottesville has created a lot of important conversations.  A couple of days ago, Wilbert Cooper (an editor at wrote an article entitled Let’s Blow Up Mt. Rushmore, as a response to the notion of tearing down racist monuments.

He later clarified that “The headline and URL of this story have been updated. We do not condone violence in any shape or form, and the use of “blow up” in the original headline as a rhetorical device was misguided and insensitive. We apologize for the error.”

Right wing publications have run with the sensationalism of his headline and have used that as evidence of the left’s craziness (as if any more evidence is needed—both sides are crazy as hell.) I am pretty sure Cooper did not mean to actually “blow it up.”

That being said, it was a bad article and he should still apologize.

You may ask, “Well if he was being facetious, why would he have to apologize?”

Captain Obvious Statement

If I wrote a piece about slavery plantations and whether they should be destroyed, and yet I didn’t ask any black people about it, I would be rightfully eviscerated. If I wrote that same piece about slavery plantations and I didn’t even mention or contemplate black folks, I would rightfully be called “racially insensitive.” (No, people of color cannot be “racist.”)

But that is exactly what happened in’s piece. The writer, Cooper, raises a very important question, “If Rushmore ever did get “blown up,” what should those dudes be replaced with?”

Yet somehow, in asking that important question, Cooper doesn’t contemplate, ask or even mention the Native people who have lived in that area since time immemorial.

How the hell do you not even mention Native people in an article about gorgeous Native land known as the Black Hills, which was desecrated and, like a plantation, turned into a shrine of white supremacy?

The United States stole it from the Great Sioux Nation after the Great Sioux War of 1876 even though the Treaty of Fort Laramie from 1868 granted the Black Hills to the Lakota forever.

Cooper didn’t mention that. But he did contemplate such important figures as Martin Luther King, Jr., Malcolm X, and even Barack Obama replacing the current faces.

Somehow, Cooper didn’t talk about the Indigenous people from who the federal government literally stole this sacred ground. Somehow, Cooper contemplates a more equal America—without ‘old monuments to famous white American men,’ but perhaps with famous black American men—but doesn’t contemplate a more equitable world where the folks most directly affected by the land theft or this monument, Native people, are even in the conversation.

Download Today! 50 Must-See Modern Native Films and Performances

Enjoy films for and about real Indians Natives when you download our special free report, 50 Must-See Modern Native Films and Performances!

This is not to pick on Cooper, by the way. I’m sure he’s a good person and is undoubtedly a solid journalist. But Cooper is not just a writer; he is an editor for He is black. He writes about social justice. He has a pedigree that SHOUTS, “I know better!”

Yet, this shows that even a black editor who writes about social justice for—a person who is very likely incredibly very justice-oriented—can think of Mt. Rushmore exactly like Doane Robinson and all the racist white folks when they conceived the huge monument: They don’t contemplate Native people. None of us are immune—he thinks through an anthropomorphic, selfish and ultimately from a white supremacist lens. Like gentrifiers across the U.S., Cooper did not and does not contemplate the impact on the people who were there before.

For the Record

I’m cool with removing as many of these monuments of racists as possible although I still think it’s important to ask the folks most impacted by the racism what they think.

Who am I to tell them what’s best for them? But I also think that there’s a danger that we confuse removing the monument with removing the white supremacy that gave rise to the monument.  The two aren’t the same. We see that with the Robert E. Lee statue in Charlottesville.

A reporter called me a few days ago and asked me about removing a George Washington statue. ‘Sure. Tear them all down. Cool.’ But I also explained that I feel simply focusing on removing or not removing statues is missing the point.

For me, having a very serious and very honest conversation about history and also these historical figures—from George Washington to Andrew Jackson to Abraham Lincoln—is crucial. That is the point. Why do we hold these slaveholders or genocidal maniacs or mass-hangers up on a pedestal?

Maybe there’s a good reason to keep them around and maybe there’s not. Who knows? Maybe for some, the ‘goods’ outweigh the ‘bads’ and they should be memorialized for eternity.  That’s not my call. That’s why the conversation is so important and we should not simply skip ahead to ‘tear them all down.’

I also think that it’s good to have a conversation about what qualifies anyone for immortalization in a statue, including Indigenous, black and woman leaders. No one is above reproach and I’m sure folks can bring up any amount of bad things about our most iconic historical figures.

Does anyone qualify for this royal treatment?

I asked a few brilliant Indigenous people about Mt. Rushmore. Unfortunately, Vice (and surely not the right-wing rags like Breitbart and other garbage sites that have running with this story,) has not thought to ask the original inhabitants about our thoughts on this topic. What else is new, right?

Here is what they had to say:

Nick Tilsen, Oglala

Those aren’t my forefathers on that mountain. They represent the spilled blood of my ancestors. My forefathers are Sitting Bull and Crazy Horse and I would never blow up a mountain to memorialize them. I would do it through my actions to help my land, water, air and people.

Joye Braun, Cheyenne River

Turn it back over to the treaty-signing tribes. We could change the name to shrine the hypocrisy, charge the heck out of the American patriots, give workshops on rewriting history and reconciliation. Or blow it up. Either way it needs to come down. We should also file for theft for all the years they’ve overcharged and perpetuated colonist lies and racism. I think they are culpable regarding the continued racism and the many hate crimes against Indigenous people. It’s a symbol of the colonizer mentality and steeped in racism.”

Chelsey Luger, Hunkpapa

There’s no way of repairing the damage/desecration, but as far as property, it falls right back into the rest of the Black Hills conversation. The Sioux Nation still owns it rightfully, and we should never take the money, and I don’t think we will.


In sum, journalists, you have to include Indigenous people into these conversations and ask, ‘What does this continent look like after we begin to deconstruct white supremacy?’

It’s not just these monuments and things that you consider ‘Indigenous issues.’

You’ve gotta check in with us.

Why? Because we’re the only ones who know what this continent looked like before the construction of white supremacy.

Ask us. We know a little something.

Gyasi Ross, "Thing About Skins," Editor at Large

Wesley Roach, Skan Photography

Gyasi Ross, “Thing About Skins,” Editor at Large

Gyasi Ross, Editor at Large

Blackfeet Nation/Suquamish Territories

Breakdances With Wolves Podcast, available on Soundcloud, iTunes

Twitter: @BigIndianGyasi

Instagram: BigIndianGyasi

  • Nancy I.

    What if we DID remove the faces of tge whute man, just enough to keep the integrity of the Six Grandfathers? It offended us when it was defaced because we KNEW not to change what the Great spirit created.
    Should their faces be removed and the rest left natural or should we replace them with Sitting Bull,Geronimo,Crazy Horse and Techumsa?
    Just a thought

  • They don’t ask the indigenous because we stand in the shadows – I understand that IC cut off AIM because IC didn’t feel they wanted to “shame” some people. The Jews never hold back on pointing the finger and shaming the Nazi & the Africans never hold back on shaming Europeans for their slavery here on this continent. Why are the indigenous holding back on shaming the Western Europeans for what their forefathers did here with their diabolical & enormous acts of genocide?

  • Also, the monstrous thing called Mt Rushmore was nothing more than idolatry that was part of European efforts to record & display possession of this continent by Western Europe as they meticulously & methodically displayed their ownership & tried to erase any life here before them. They are still desperately doing it every single day – naming everything under the sun with a European name, from bricks to hills & lakes, ponds, mtns, parks, trees, flowers, grassblades- everything. As though they created these natural beauties they shamelessly place a European man’s name on it – claiming it as though they own it. Mt. R should have Hitler’s image included cause these were his mentors or blew it up and let nature take over as it should have been left to do.

  • what if you used 3d projection on mount rushmore to bring back to life the way it looked before being carved? i recently saw a photo of the old black mountains and then i thought about a magic mountain we have here …. it was only then that i understood the deep pain that woud mean to me if the people tha most damage made to my peopl even carved the face of the mountain with the face of the perpetrators….

    bring the six grandfathers back to life in the form of light

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Credit Card Identification Number

This number is recorded as an additional security precaution.


American Express

4 digit, non-embossed number printed above your account number on the front of your card.


3-digit, non-embossed number printed on the signature panel on the of the card immediately following the card account number.


3-digit, non-embossed number printed on the signature panel on the back of the card.

Enter Your Log In Credentials

Send this to a friend

I thought you might find this interesting:
Native People Discuss What To Do About Mt. Rushmore (No, Don’t Blow it Up, Stupid Ass